Board Thread:Editing on Casualty Wiki/@comment-25050081-20170815174035/@comment-8117023-20170819232321

Titan95 wrote: I do see where you're coming from with the titles, they're not going to be as well known due to the fact they're the trailer names. As for what you deemed subjective about the navbox, it will look odd and out of place - there's no doubt about that. I personally think it would look bad - but that's my opinion. Whichever way you look at it, it's not going to fit in with the rest of the list. I hardly think making up episode titles will fix the issue that we did not create. Titan95 wrote: As far as inconsistency goes, we could mention the preview clip names for all old episodes, but there's not really a need to. Except that there is a need now, because they've magically become relevant. Titan95 wrote: I do understand 100% where you're coming from on this whole issue here though: bottom line is they're not the actual episode names. However, as long as we put a reference or footnote on the articles, surely this is clarifying any misunderstanding viewers may have. This is essential though - we can't just put up unexplained episode names without an explanation. You were complaining about readers having to hover over a link to find out what series the article is referring to but forcing them to click on a link to read a bit of small-print saying, "We're using the title of an irrelevant piece of media to substitute the inconvenient lack of a real title" is fine?

What about the followers of your Twitter account? The last tweet about using the preview titles as a stand-in was made 4 days ago and now you've posted "Episode 2 - "Limitless" is on next week at 20:45.", like anybody is going to remember.